Eta Disability Online, Employment & Training Administration (ETA)

PART Section III Program Management

3.1 Does the agency regularly collect timely and credible performance information, including information from key program partners, and use it to manage the program and improve performance?

Evidence

WIASRD Data

WIG Process Evaluation Instrument

WIG Process Evaluation Instrument

DPN Process Evaluation Instrument

Select EIMS Narratives

Alaska quarterly report         Colorado quarterly report
Delaware Nation quarterly report     Napa quarterly report     Oklahoma quarterly report

Select EIMS SF 269 submission

California SF 269      Chicago SF 269      Oklahoma SF 269

Select WIG Teleconference Notes

Broome-Tioga Workforce Development System      Concho Valley Local Workforce Investment Board

State of Hawaii      Seattle-King County Workforce Development Council

Cameron Works, Inc.       Three Rivers Workforce Investment Board

3.2 Are Federal managers and program partners (including grantees, sub-grantees, contractors, cost-sharing partners, and other government partners) held accountable for cost, schedule and performance results?

Evidence

Select EIMS SF 269 submission

California SF 269

Chicago SF 269

Oklahoma SF 269

Select Monitoring Reports

Agency for Workforce Innovation

Mississippi Development Authority

South Carolina Employment Security Commission

Select WIG Teleconference Notes

Broome-Tioga Workforce Development System

Concho Valley Local Workforce Investment Board

State of Hawaii

Seattle-King County Workforce Development Council

Cameron Works, Inc.

Three Rivers Workforce Investment Board

3.3 Are funds (Federal and partners') obligated in a timely manner and spent for the intended purpose?

Evidence

WIG Solicitations for Grant Application

DPN Cooperative Agreements

DPN Cooperative Agreement 2003

DPN Cooperative Agreement for Year 2 Funding 2004

DPN Cooperative Agreement for New States

Select WIG Quarterly Reports

Alaska quarterly report

Colorado quarterly report

Delaware Nation quarterly report

Napa quarterly report

Oklahoma quarterly report

Select DPN Quarterly Reports

Arizona Quarterly Report

California Quarterly Report

Colorado Quarterly Report

Florida Quarterly Report

Select WIG Teleconference Notes

Broome-Tioga Workforce Development System

Concho Valley Local Workforce Investment Board

State of Hawaii

Seattle-King County Workforce Development Council

Cameron Works, Inc.

Three Rivers Workforce Investment Board

3.4 Does the program have procedures (e.g. competitive sourcing/cost comparisons, IT improvements, appropriate incentives) to measure and achieve efficiencies and cost effectiveness in program execution?

Evidence

WIG Solicitations for Grant Application

SPR Data

WIG Process Evaluation Reports for Round 1

WIG I Analysis Reports Year 1
Lessons Learned from Work Incentive Grantees

Work Incentive Grants Grant Application Summary Report #2

Work Incentive Grant Analysis Information By Subject Matter Report #3

WIG Process Evaluation Analysis Year 1

WIG Process Evaluation Instrument

WIG Process Evaluation Analysis Summary Year 1

WIG I Analysis Reports Year 2

Work Incentive Grant Process Evaluation Form

WIG Process Evaluation Analysis Round One Grantees Year 2

WIG Process Evaluation Analysis Round One Grantees Year 2 Executive Summary

WIG Process Evaluation Reports for Round 2

WIG II Analysis Reports Year 1
Work Incentive Grant Process Evaluation Form

WIG Process Evaluation Analysis Round Two Grantees Year 1

WIG Process Evaluation Analysis Round Two Grantees Year 2 Executive Summary

WIG II Analysis Reports Year 2
WIG Process Evaluation Instrument

WIG Process Analysis Round Two Grantees year 1 and year 2 Executive Summary

WIG Process Evaluation Analysis Round Two Grantees year 1 and year 2

WIG Process Evaluation Reports for Round 3

WIG III Analysis Reports Year 1
WIG Process Evaluation Instrument

WIG Process Evaluation and Navigator Supplemental Survey Analysis Round Three Grantees YEAR 1 Executive Summary

WIG Navigator Supplemental Survey

WIG Process Evaluation and Navigator Supplemental Survey Analysis Round Three
Grantees YEAR 1

One-Stop Toolkit Website

University of Iowa Law, Health Policy, and Disability Center Website

3.5 Does the program collaborate and coordinate effectively with related programs?

Evidence

DOL-SSA Interagency Agreement

WIG Solicitations for Grant Application

DPN Cooperative Agreements
DPN Cooperative Agreement 2003
DPN Cooperative Agreement for Year 2 Funding 2004
DPN Cooperative Agreement for New States

Section 188 Regulations

Ticket TEN No. 6-02 on the Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act

3.6 Does the program use strong financial management practices?

Evidence

Select Notice of Awards for WIG
California DPN Cooperative Agreement
Mississippi DPN Cooperative Agreement

OFAM TAG SF 269 SF 424A

3.7 Has the program taken meaningful steps to address its management deficiencies?

Evidence

WIG Solicitations for Grant Application

DPN Cooperative Agreements
DPN Cooperative Agreement 2003
DPN Cooperative Agreement for Year 2 Funding 2004
DPN Cooperative Agreement for New States

Draft Regional FPO Re-designation Memo

3.CO1 Are grants awarded based on a clear competitive process that includes a qualified assessment of merit?

Evidence

WIG Solicitations for Grant Application

3.CO2 Does the program have oversight practices that provide sufficient knowledge of grantee activities?

Evidence

Select WIG Teleconference Notes

Broome-Tioga Workforce Development System      Concho Valley Local Workforce Investment Board

State of Hawaii      Seattle-King County Workforce Development Council

Cameron Works, Inc.       Three Rivers Workforce Investment Board

FPO List

Select Monitoring Reports

Agency for Workforce Innovation
Mississippi Development Authority
South Carolina Employment Security Commission

WIG Process Evaluation Reports for Round 1

WIG I Analysis Reports Year 1
Lessons Learned from Work Incentive Grantees

Work Incentive Grants Grant Application Summary Report #2

Work Incentive Grant Analysis Information By Subject Matter Report #3

WIG Process Evaluation Analysis Year 1

WIG Process Evaluation Instrument

WIG Process Evaluation Analysis Summary Year 1

WIG I Analysis Reports Year 2

Work Incentive Grant Process Evaluation Form

WIG Process Evaluation Analysis Round One Grantees Year 2

WIG Process Evaluation Analysis Round One Grantees Year 2 Executive Summary

WIG Process Evaluation Reports for Round 2

WIG II Analysis Reports Year 1
Work Incentive Grant Process Evaluation Form

WIG Process Evaluation Analysis Round Two Grantees Year 1

WIG Process Evaluation Analysis Round Two Grantees Year 2 Executive Summary

WIG II Analysis Reports Year 2
WIG Process Evaluation Instrument

WIG Process Analysis Round Two Grantees year 1 and year 2 Executive Summary

WIG Process Evaluation Analysis Round Two Grantees year 1 and year 2

WIG Process Evaluation Reports for Round 3

WIG III Analysis Reports Year 1
WIG Process Evaluation Instrument

WIG Process Evaluation and Navigator Supplemental Survey Analysis Round Three Grantees YEAR 1 Executive Summary

WIG Navigator Supplemental Survey

WIG Process Evaluation and Navigator Supplemental Survey Analysis Round Three
Grantees YEAR 1

DPN Process Evaluation Reports

DPN Analysis Quarterly Report-1 Jan-Mar 2004
Disability Program Navigator Initiative Process Evaluation Analysis Quarter One:January-March 2004

Disability Program Navigator Initiative Process Evaluation Analysis Quarter One:January-March 2004 Navigator Development

Disability Program Navigator Initiative Process Evaluation Analysis Quarter One:January-March 2004 Supplement A

Disability Program Navigator Initiative Process Evaluation Analysis Quarter One:January-March 2004 Supplement B

Disability Program Navigator Initiative Process Evaluation Analysis Quarter One:January-March 2004 Supplement C

Navigator Quarterly Report Quarter 1: January 1, 2004 through March 31, 2004

Navigator Quarterly Report Section B. Time Allocation Internal Tool/Month

Navigator Quarterly Report Section G. Referrals Made by You to Others Systems Collaborators Internal Tool

Navigator Quarterly Report - Quarter 1:January - March 2004

DPN Process Evaluation Reports

DPN Analysis Quarterly Report-2 Apr-June 2004
Disability Program Navigator Initiative Process Evaluation Analysis Quarter Two Addendum: April - June 2004

Disability Program Navigator Initiative Process Evaluation Analysis Quarter Two: April - June 2004 Navigator Development

Disability Program Navigator Initiative Process Evaluation Analysis Quarter Two April - June 2004 Supplement A

Disability Program Navigator Initiative Process Evaluation Analysis Quarter Two April - June 2004 Supplement B

Disability Program Navigator Initiative Process Evaluation Analysis Quarter Two April - June 2004 Supplement C

Disability Program Navigator Initiative Process Evaluation Analysis Quarter Two April - June 2004 Executive Summary

Navigator Quarterly Report - Quarter 2: April - June 2004

Navigator Quarterly Report Section B. Time Allocation Internal Tool/Month

Navigator Quarterly Report Section G. Referrals Made by You to Others Systems Collaborators Internal Tool

DPN Process Evaluation Reports

DPN Analysis Quarterly Report-3 July-Sep 2004
Disability Program Navigator Initiative Process Evaluation Analysis Quarter three Addendum: July - September 2004
Disability Program Navigator Initiative Process Evaluation Analysis Quarter three July - September 2004 Executive Summary
Navigator Quarterly Report - Quarter 3: July - September 2004
Navigator Quarterly Report Section B. Time Allocation Internal Tool/Month
Navigator Quarterly Report Section G. Referrals Made by You to Others Systems Collaborators Internal Tool

EIMS Screen Shots

SF269

Narrative

GEMS Screen Shots

3.CO3 Does the program collect grantee performance data on an annual basis and make it available to the public in a transparent and meaningful manner?

Evidence

WIASRD Data

University of Iowa Law, Health Policy, and Disability Center Website