DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Job Training Partnership Act, Title III, Demonstration
Program: Dislocated Worker Manufacturing Technology Demonstration
Program
AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of Funds and Solicitation for Grant Applications (SGA).
SUMMARY: All information required to submit a grant application
is contained in this announcement. The U.S. Department of Labor
(DOL), Employment and Training Administration (ETA), announces a
demonstration program to test the ability of the workforce
development system to partner with employers, training providers
and others to train dislocated workers in the skills necessary to
obtain work requiring technology skills in occupations in
manufacturing industry settings with long-term growth potential.
The program will be funded with Secretary's National Reserve
funds appropriated for Title III of the Job Training Partnership
Act (JTPA) and administered in accordance with 29 CFR Part 95 and
97 as applicable.
This notice provides information on the process that eligible
entities must use to apply for these demonstration funds and how
grantees will be selected. It is anticipated that up to $10
million will be available for funding demonstration projects
covered by this solicitation, with no award being more than $1
million.
DATES: The closing date for receipt of proposals is February 16, 1999 at 4 p.m.(Eastern Time).
ADDRESSES: Applications shall be mailed to: U.S. Department of
Labor; Employment and Training Administration; Division of
Acquisition and Assistance; Attention: Yvonne Harrell, Reference:
SGA/DFA 99-001; 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room S-4203;
Washington, DC 20210.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fax questions to Yvonne Harrell,
Division of Acquisition Assistance at 202) 219-8739 (this is not
a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This announcement consists of five
parts. Part I describes the authorities and purpose of the
demonstration program and identifies demonstration policy. Part
II describes the application process and provides guidelines for
use in applying for demonstration grants. Part III includes the
statement of work for the demonstration projects. Part IV
describes the selection process, including the criteria that will
be used in reviewing and evaluating applications. Part V
discusses the demonstration program's monitoring, reporting and
evaluation.
Part I. Background
A. Authorities
Section 323(a)(6)of JTPA (29 U.S.C. 1662b) authorizes the use for
demonstration programs of funds reserved under Section 302 of
JTPA (29 U.S.C. 1652) and provided by the Secretary for that
purpose under Section 322 of JTPA (29 U.S.C. 1662a).
Demonstration program grantees must comply with all applicable
federal and state laws and regulations in setting up and carrying
out their programs.
B. Purpose
It is now well understood that the economy has transitioned from
the industrial age to the information age. In this age, the most
valued commodities are the skills and knowledge possessed by the
individual. Global competition has reached an unprecedented
level. Technology plays an increasingly important role in this
global scenario as nations strive to build things or provide
services that are faster, better or cheaper than their
competitors.
In this era of global competition and rapid technological
advances, technology is the most critical driver of economic
growth. The U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Technology
Policy, has reported advances in technology to be the single most
important determining factor in sustaining economic growth,
estimated to account for as much as half of the Nation's long-term economic growth over the past 50 years. Technology as a
method for achieving a practical result encompasses the
techniques, machines and equipment, controls, processes, and
organization of work, as well as the ideas, skills, and knowledge
underlying the work process. Traditional work environments have
altered, as have the requisite skills needed by workers to
succeed in today's workplace. Technology provides the tools for
creating a wide array of new and improved products and new
services that reach well beyond the narrow confines of
traditional labor markets. A product can now be provided from
almost any community, each with the potential to reach global
markets. The ability of a company to innovate, incorporate
technology, improve products or services, increase market share
and thus expand capacity and employment is the engine of economic
growth.
Information technologies affect almost every sector and every
industry in the United States, in terms of digitally based
products, services, and production and work processes. The very
nature of advanced technology lies in the ability of a business
or industry to identify, assess, adopt and incorporate
information based technologies into everyday business and
production processes. The information/
knowledge-based workplace of today's leading companies requires
workers to possess conceptual, analytical, communication,
interpersonal, and self-management skills beyond the basic
academic and technical skills of the traditional workplace. There
is often a skills deficit experienced by employers who
continuously push the envelope to innovate, and adopt new
technology in order to stay ahead of competitors, both domestic
and international.
With accelerated changes in technology, America's workers often
discover their skill base has become out of date. New approaches
are needed to help American workers stay competitive. Workers
need to know and understand what skill standards employers are
looking for, and they need to have the means to raise their
skills to match that demand.
Our Nation's workforce development system is working to meet this
need, but skill shortages in technology are currently very high
in some industry sectors and geographic areas. Severe shortages
of workers who can apply and use advanced technologies could
undermine U.S. innovation, productivity, and competitiveness in
world markets. A steady supply of skill workers will help our
Nation's industries remain competitive. More importantly, these
workers need to possess the appropriate skills demanded in the
workplace. Ideally, a system of "just in time" training would be
able to supply skilled workers that meet industry driven
standards and certifications.
The purpose of this demonstration is to test the ability of the
Nation's workforce development system to partner with employers,
training providers and others to train dislocated workers in the
skills necessary to obtain work requiring technology skills in
manufacturing occupations and industries experiencing shortages
of such workers.
Industries such as aerospace, computers and electronics
manufacturing, machinery and motor vehicles, chemicals and
petroleum, and specialized instruments and devices as well as
bio-technical/biomedical could be among the manufacturing
industries experiencing technology skill shortages among those
workers they seek to employ.
Manufacturing technologies have gone through several
metamorphoses. The impact of these technological trends is often
felt as a loss in the number of unskilled jobs with an increase
in more technology-savvy jobs required to control automated,
computer-operated machinery. As the tools and equipment become
more automated, the skills needed for entry level technicians and
operators multiply. Increasing use of robotics requires
employees who once performed manual labor to become technicians
who control automatic processes remotely by computer. Assemblers
frequently are now required to possess computer skills for
controlling automatic processes remotely. The shift towards
automating the production line has resulted in a need for workers
who are able to work with computers, robotics, and Computer
Numerically Controlled (CNC) machines. Instead of interacting
with the products, line workers may now manage machines which
perform the processes.
A large number of the layoffs that occur within a manufacturing
company are associated with elimination or reduction of a product
and changes in technology. They generally have the largest
impact on those with lower or outdated skills. Amid massive and
continual restructuring within manufacturing, it is imperative
for manufacturing employees to commit to lifelong learning. The
technology and the push to produce a particular product that
created their present position is often soon to be replaced by
another generation of product and production process.
As a part of the Nation's Workforce Development System,
programs presently funded under Title III of the Job
Training Partnership Act, and soon to be funded under the
Workforce Investment Act of 1998, annually provide
adjustment and training assistance to over 500,000
individuals who have lost their jobs through no fault of
their own. These employment and training funds targeted to
serve dislocated workers are managed through State and local
workforce development organizations who design and operate a
national system for training and reemployment programs based
on: 1) the needs and characteristics of the local dislocated
worker population; 2) the needs of local employers for
skilled workers; and 3) the capabilities and capacities of
training institutions and other local service providers.
The emerging infrastructure of One-Stop/Career Center
systems provides comprehensive and integrated workforce
development services to both participants and employers.
Under this demonstration, the Department will fund projects
that specifically document the existence of and respond to
the reported shortages in their geographical area of workers
in manufacturing jobs requiring technology skills. For
purposes of this solicitation, the term "technology" may be
viewed broadly as the link between people and technology in
the workplace.
Successful applications may be based on the use of new or
innovative service strategies such as the involvement of
under represented groups of dislocated workers for existing
training programs; the development and use of curricula
geared specifically to eligible groups of dislocated workers
and the needs of employers with openings in technology-related jobs; or the development of concentrated training
models for workers with a residue of skill knowledge from
previous related employment, or use of curriculum and skills
training interventions designed to impart knowledge, skills
and abilities of industry skill standards (where available
or under development).
Each successful application will document where there are
strong linkages with specific employers' demand for workers
with technology-related skills. The demonstration program
goals of placement of the project participants in jobs using
technology in manufacturing industries which are targeted in
the proposal must be clearly addressed and sufficient
assurance must be demonstrated that this goal can be
accomplished.
Participant satisfaction with project services and with
their jobs, as well as their employer's satisfaction with
project services and with the participants' skill level and
work, should be measured not only at the end of the project
but also at critical points identified by the applicant
during the progress of the demonstration's implementation.
C. Demonstration Policy
1. Grant Awards
DOL anticipates awarding ten (10) to fifteen (15) grants,
not to exceed $1 million per grant. It is anticipated that
awards will be made by April 30, 1999. Award decisions will
be published on the Internet at ETA's Home Page at
http://www.doleta.gov.
2. Eligible Applicants
Any organization capable of fulfilling the terms and
conditions of this solicitation may apply. Applicants who
are not Substate grantees under JTPA Title III, or One-Stop
Career Center Operators or Workforce Investment Boards under
WIA must submit a letter from the authorized signatory of
one or more of such organizations continuing comments on the
applicant's proposal. Under Lobbying Disclosure Act of
1995, Section 18, an organization described in Section
501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue code of 1986 which engages
in lobbying activities shall not be eligible for the receipt
of Federal funds constituting an award grant or loan. This
is a risk free Federal program: therefore, all for profit
organizations that apply will not be able to receive a fee
if awarded a grant.
3. Eligible Participants:
All participants in projects funded under this demonstration
program must be either:
a). Eligible dislocated workers as defined at JTPA Section
301(a)(1), and 314(h)(1) of the Job Training Partnership
Act. These sections of the law may be viewed at
http://doleta.gov/regs/statutes/jtpalaw.htm.
Proposed projects may target subgroups of the eligible
population based on factors such as (but not limited to)
occupation, industry, nature of dislocation, and reason for
unemployment. Note: Individuals whose eligibility is based
upon their status as long-term unemployed (Section
301(a)(1)(C) JTPA) must have a demonstrated attachment to
the labor force.
b). Incumbent workers. These are currently-employed workers
whose employers have determined that the workers require
training in order to help keep their firms competitive and
the subject workers employed, avert layoffs, upgrade
workers' skills, increase wages earned by employees and/or
keep workers skills competitive. Such technology training
would support further job retention and career development
for improved economic self-sufficiency for employed workers,
especially those most vulnerable to job loss, and increase
the capability of the employing firm(s) to access and retain
skilled workers.
4. Applicable technology. Applicant's proposal must
describe the technology skills to be demonstrated in the
grant in the context of the skills presently in use in the
industry or plants-- e.g., how this demonstration is related
to the introduction of new equipment, upgrading incumbent
workers, development of a new product. If this technology
application will enable improvements in the manufacturing
process, a description of such benefits should be provided.
If this technology is linked to a specific employer or group
of employers, discuss the impact on present skill levels
caused by the demonstration activities including changes
caused by equipment, materials or work organization. Where
applicable, relate changes to factors affecting workers such
as increased or decreased decision-making responsibility,
changes in advancement opportunities or transferability of
new skills, changes in the pace of work, and wage increases
related to increased skill attainment. Indicate whether
this technology could be considered "leading edge" by the
industry.
5. Allowable Activities
Funds provided through this demonstration may be used only
to provide services of the type described at Section 314(c)
and (d) of JTPA. Supportive services may be provided when
they are necessary to enable an individual who is eligible
for training but cannot afford to pay for such supportive
services, to participate in the training program. These
services are defined in Section 4(24) of JTPA. (Use ETA's
web site reference above to view.)
Grant funds may be used to reimburse employers for
extraordinary costs associated with on-the-job training of
program participants, in accordance with the provisions of
20 CFR 627.240. In addition to the limitations and
requirements provided in JTPA, particularly at Part C of
Title I, prospective applicants should be aware that grant
funds may not be used for the following purposes: (a) for
training that an employer is in a position to provide and
would have provided in the absence of the requested grant;
(b) to pay salaries for program participants; and (c) for
acquisition of production equipment. Applicants may budget
limited amounts of grant funds to work with technical
experts or consultants to provide advice and develop more
complete project plans after a grant award, however, the
level of detail in the project plan may affect the amount of
funding provided.
Grant activities may include:
(a) development, testing and initial application of
curricula focused on intensive, short-term training to get
participants into productive, high demand information or
advanced technology employment as quickly as possible;
(b) working with employers in develop and apply worksite-based learning strategies that utilize cutting-edge
technology and equipment;
(c) development of employer-based training programs that
will take advantage of opportunities created by employers'
needs for workers with new technology skills;
(d) development and initial application of contextual
learning opportunities for participants to learn technology
theory in a classroom setting while applying that learning
in an on-the-job setting;
(e) use of curriculum and skills training programs that are
designed to impart learning to meet employer-specified or
industry specific skill standards or certification
requirements;
(f) convening of an Employer Advisory Board to identify
skills gaps of job applicants and present workers affecting
the ability of the employer to offer a competitive product
and develop a strategy for retraining;
(g) innovative linkage and collaboration between employers
and the local Substate Grantee and/or One-Stop/Career Center
system to ensure a steady supply of high demand, high skill
information or advanced technology workers.
The above are illustrative examples and are not intended to
be an exhaustive listing of possible demonstration project
designs or approaches which may achieve the purpose of this
solicitation. However, successful applicants must
demonstrate the direct involvement by employers experiencing
skill shortages in the design and operation of the project
as well as provide substantive documentation about the
existence of skill shortages for the industry or occupations
to be targeted by the proposed project. Documentation
should include a description of the employer involvement
anticipated in the project. An employer advisory committee
may be one means of accomplishing employer involvement.
6. Coordination
In order to maximize the use of public resources and avoid
duplication of effort, applicants will coordinate the
delivery of services under this demonstration with the
delivery of services under other programs (public or
private), available to all or part of the target group.
Projects linking or collaborating with an existing USDOL
funded One-Stop/Career Center initiative and/or local JTPA
Substate Grantee located within a project area fulfill this
requirement. The use of Pell Grants for eligible workers or
the use of State training or education funds provided for
dislocated workers or certain types of employers should also
be addressed in the application.
7. Period of Performance
The period of performance shall be 27 months from the date
of execution by the Government. Delivery of services to
participants shall commence within 90 days of execution of a
grant unless a significant portion of the grant
implementation addresses the development of new curriculum
or planning strategies. If enrollments are not anticipated
to occur within 90 days, the circumstances should be
specifically addressed in the application with the reasons
provided and an alternative time frame provided.
8. Option to Extend
DOL may elect to exercise its option to extend these grants
for an additional one (1) or two (2) years of operation,
based on the availability of demonstration funding under the
Workforce Investment Act, successful program operation, and
the determination that a grantee's initial program findings
could further inform the workforce development system
through refinement of the present demonstration.
Part II. Application Process and Guidelines
A. Contents
An original and three (3) copies of the application shall be
submitted. The application shall consist of two (2)
separate and distinct parts: Part I, the Financial Proposal,
and Part II, the Technical Proposal.
1. Financial Application
Part I, the Financial Proposal, shall contain the SF-424,
"Application for Federal Assistance" (Appendix A) and the
"Budget Information Sheet" (Appendix B). The Federal
Domestic Assistance Catalog number is 17.246. The budget
shall include on separate pages a detailed breakout of each
proposed budget line item found on the Budget Information
Sheet, including detailed administrative costs and costs for
one or more of the following categories as applicable: basic
readjustment services, supportive services, and retraining
services. The Salaries line item shall be used to document
the project staffing plan by providing a detailed listing of
each staff position providing more than .05 FTE support to
the project, by annual salary, number of months assigned to
demonstration responsibilities, and FTE percentage to be
charged to the grant. In addition, for the Contractual line
item, list each of the planned contracts and the amount of
the contract. Where a contract amount exceeds $75,000, a
detailed backup budget to how the amount of the contract was
derived must be included. For each budget line item that
includes funds or in-kind contributions from a source other
than the grant funds, identify the source, the amount, and
in-kind contributions, including any restrictions that may
apply to these funds.
Costs associated with the development of curriculum and
other one-time costs should be noted separately in order for
reviewers to identify costs associated with development and
start-up as well as on-going participant costs.
2. Technical Proposal
Part II, the technical proposal shall demonstrate the
offeror's capabilities in accordance with the Statement of
Work in Part III of this solicitation. A grant application
shall be limited to twenty (20) double-spaced, single-side,
8.5-inch x 11-inch pages with 1-inch margins. Attachments
shall not exceed ten (10) pages. Text type shall be 12
point or larger. Applications that do not meet these
requirements will not be considered. Each application shall
include the Checklist provided as Appendix C, a Time line
outlining project activities provided as Appendix D, and an
Executive Summary not to exceed two (2) pages. NO COST DATA
OR REFERENCE TO PRICE SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE TECHNICAL
PROPOSAL.
B. Hand-Delivered Applications
Applications should be mailed no later than five (5) days
prior to the closing date for the receipt of applications.
However, if applications are hand-delivered, they must be
received at the designated place by 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time
on the closing date for receipt of applications. All
overnight mail will be considered to be hand-delivered and
must be received at the designated place by the specified
time and closing date. Telegraphed and/or faxed proposals
will not be honored. Applications that fail to adhere to
the above instructions will not be honored.
C. Late Applications
Any application received at the office designated in the
solicitation after the exact time specified for receipt will
not be considered unless it:
(1) Was sent by U.S. Postal Service registered or
certified mail not later than the fifth calendar day before
the closing date specified for receipt of applications
(e.g., an offer submitted in response to a solicitation
requiring receipt of application by the 30th of January must
have been mailed by the 25th); or
(2) Was sent by U.S. Postal Service Express Mail Next Day
Service--Post Office to Addressee, not later than 5:00 p.m.
at the place of mailing two working days prior to the date
specified for receipt of application. The term "working
days" excludes weekends and U.S. Federal holidays.
The only acceptable evidence to establish the date of
mailing of a late application sent by U.S. Postal Service
registered or certified mail is the U.S. postmark on the
envelope or wrapper and on the original receipt from the
U.S. Postal Service. Both postmarks must show a legible
date or the proposal shall be processed as if it had been
mailed late. "Postmark" means a printed, stamped, or
otherwise placed impression (exclusive of a postage meter
machine impression) that is readily identifiable without
further action as having been supplied and affixed by an
employee of the U.S. Postal Service on the date of mailing.
Therefore, applicants should request the postal clerk to
place a legible hand cancellation "bull's eye" postmark on
both the receipt and the envelope or wrapper.
The only acceptable evidence to establish the date of
mailing of a late application sent by "Express Mail Next-Day
Service--Post Office to Addressee" is the date entered by
the post office receiving clerk on the "Express Mail Next
Day Service--Post Office to Addressee" label and the
postmarks on both the envelope and wrapper and the original
receipt from the U.S. Postal Service. "Postmark" has the
same meaning as defined above. Therefore, an applicant
should request the postal clerk to place a legible hand
cancellation "bull's eye" postmark on both the receipt and
the envelope or wrapper.
D. Withdrawal of Applications
Applications may be withdrawn by written notice or telegram
(including mailgram) received at any time before award.
Applications may be withdrawn in person by the applicant or
by an authorized representative thereof, if the
representative's identity is made known and the
representative signs a receipt for the proposal.
Part III. Statement of Work
Each grant application must follow the format outlined in
this Part. For sections A through G below, each application
should include:
(1) Information that indicates adherence to the provisions
described in Part I, Background (Authorities, Purpose, and
Demonstration Policy) and Part II, Application Process and
Guidelines, of this announcement; and (2) other information
that the applicant believes will address the selection
criteria identified in Part IV of this solicitation.
Information required under A and B below shall be provided
separately for each labor market area where dislocated
workers will be served. To the extent that the project
design differs for different geographic areas, information
required under section C below shall be provided for each
geographic area.
A. Target Population
Describe the characteristics of the proposed target
population for the project, e.g.,educational level, previous
occupation, age range, likely transferrable skills, length
of unemployment, and language limitations. If that
population is limited to one or more subgroups of the
dislocated worker population, explain the basis for such
limitation. Describe the size and needs of the target
population in the local area as they relate to the services
available to the grant. Provide documentation showing there
is a significant number of dislocated workers with the
target population's characteristics in the project area(s).
If the project seeks to serve under represented subgroups
such as minority groups, women, older workers (50 years of
age and older), disabled individuals, within a particular
occupation and the selected subgroup has unique
characteristics or needs such characteristics or needs
should be identified. Substantive and timely documentation
of the subgroup's under representation must be included.
Note: Up to 5 points of extra credit will be awarded when
the targeted population includes at least 40 percent planned
enrollment of an under represented subgroup for the
occupation in which training will take place.
Indicate how the number of workers to be enrolled was
determined. Sufficient documentation should be provided to
show that workers with appropriate characteristics to meet
the purposes of this grant are available in sufficient
numbers to meet the recruitment goals of the grant
recognizing that not all workers with appropriate
characteristics will chose to participate.
No more than 20 percent of the total demonstration
funding allocated by the Department pursuant to this
Solicitation for Grant Applications shall be for incumbent
workers.
B. Available Jobs
Jobs targeted for this demonstration must be related to the
manufacturing industry covered by the Standard Industrial
Classification(SIC) Codes 21-39 and must involve the use of
technology skills in a manufacturing setting. Describe the
jobs that will be available and targeted for placement to
project participants upon completion of training and
placement services including the strategy(ies) for
identifying job openings that appear appropriate to the
training planned and meet the target wage at placement goals
established in the proposal. Include information about the
number and type of jobs, wage information and the specific
set of skills, knowledge or duties (industry-sponsored
standards of certifications). Provide documentation
(Footnote sources) that a shortage of qualified workers
exists in the local area to fill positions in the targeted
occupations in the absence of the proposed project.
Anecdotal data should not be used. Information from the
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) available through a variety
of web sites including BLS, O*NET and America's Labor Market
Information System (ALMIS), should be considered as a key
source of documentation. In addition, State Occupational
Information Coordinating Committee (SOICC) and JTPA Substate
Grantee local job training plan may also be considered.
Other sources from the private sector such as Chamber of
Commerce or local Technology Council surveys as well as
university studies are also acceptable. Data must relate to
local employment shortages.
Substantive linkages with specific employers who are
experiencing skill shortages among their present workforce
and/or the demand for additional employees with technology
skills in documented occupational shortages must be
provided. Letters from employers who have made a commitment
to the demonstration project are the most appropriate form
of documentation.
If some placements will be made with employers who have not
been identified at the time of application, describe the job
development and placement strategy to be used to assure
placement of demonstration participants.
C. Project Design
(1)Purpose. Describe the specific purpose or purposes
of the proposed project.
(2)Service Plan. Describe the services to be provided
from the time of selection of participants through placement
of those participants in jobs. Describe any services to be
provided subsequent to job placement. The descriptions
shall provide a clear understanding of the services and
support that will be necessary for participants to be placed
successfully in jobs and to retain those jobs, including
services not funded under the grant, and ways to address
participants' financial needs during periods of training.
Grant-funded activities should, at a minimum, include
recruitment, eligibility determination, assessment,
retraining, job placement, and supportive services.
(a) Outreach and recruitment. Describe how eligible
dislocated workers will be identified and recruited for
participation in the project. Recruitment efforts may
address public service communications and announcements, use
of media, coordination with the JTPA Service Delivery Area
or Substate Grantee, use of community-based organizations
and other service groups. Describe the applicant's
experience in reaching dislocated workers, especially the
targeted population. It is highly recommended that non-JTPA
applicants partner with the appropriate JTPA Title III
Substate Grantee(s) or local One-Stop Career Center system
to plan and implement effective outreach and recruitment
strategies.
(b) Eligibility determination. Describe the process to
be used in determining the JTPA Title III eligibility of
potential participants in the project. It is highly
recommended that non-JTPA applicants partner with the
appropriate JTPA Title III substate grantee(s)or local One-Stop Career Center system to carry out eligibility
determination.
(c) Selection criteria. Describe the criteria and
process to be used in selecting those individuals to be
served by the project from among the total number of
eligible persons recruited for the project. Explain how the
selection criteria relate to the specific purpose of the
proposed project. Identify any assessment tools that will
be used as part of selection process.
(d) Training Services. Describe the training to be
provided--classroom, experiential, on-the-job, internships,
etc. Include the length (days and hours)and schedule, any
perquisite courses, and customization to account for
transferable skills, previous education (note: whether the
training requires new and higher educational levels than
previous skill training in the same industry), and
particular circumstances of the target population and the
skill needs of the hiring employer(s). Include information
to demonstrate that any proposed training provider is
qualified to deliver training that meets appropriate
employment standards, and any applicable certification or
licensing requirement. Past performance, qualifications of
instructors, accreditation of curricula, and similar matters
should be addressed if appropriate. Address the costs of
proposed training and other services relative to the costs
of similar training and services including courses provided
by both public and private providers in the local area. If
the training is be customized to account for individual
differences in skills levels of participants or employer
hiring needs, describe how these considerations will be
taken into account in the delivery of the training.
The training provided must support the information provided
regarding skill shortages and demand for jobs using
technology skills.
(e) Job Placement
Describe the role of the employer linkages previously
addressed in assuring the availability of jobs for
participants completing training. If an Employer Advisory
Committee is the primary employer linkage, the members of
the committee should be listed and the type of expertise
they bring to the committee noted. Provide a discussion of
the role(s) of the advisory committee and its projected
meeting frequency. Describe any additional job seeking
skills training or assistance provided to participants
completing training.
(f) Post placement services. Describe any post
placement services to be provided and explain their value to
the achievement of the project's purpose and planned
outcomes.
(g) Supportive services. Describe those supportive
services determined to be appropriate to the target
population's needs. Describe policies and procedures to
ensure that supportive services are provided only when they
are necessary to enable an individual who is eligible for
training but cannot afford to pay for such supportive
services, to participate in the training program. Indicate
how the participants' financial needs during the period of
training will be addressed.
(h) Relocation. Describe the limitations and
eligibility criteria for relocation assistance, if such
assistance is included in the proposal.
(3)Participant flow. Provide a flowchart noting length
of time for various activities (such as one day for
assessment, etc.) to illustrate how the project will ensure
access to necessary and appropriate reemployment and
retraining services. Show the sequence of services and the
criteria to be used to determine the appropriateness of
specific services for particular participants. Note where
service choice options will be available to participants.
Indicate the average length of participation from
eligibility determination and enrollment in the
demonstration project to placement in an unsubsidized job.
(4) Relationship to prior experience. Discuss how the
applicant's prior experience in working with dislocated
individuals affects or influences the design of the proposed
project. Note especially lessons learned or positive
experiences that will be replicated.
D. Planned Outcomes
A description of the project outcomes and of the specific
measures, and planned achievement levels, that will be used
to determine the success of the project. These outcomes and
measures must include, but are not limited to:
(1) The number of participants projected: to be enrolled
in services, to successfully complete services through the
project, and to be placed into new jobs; a minimum of 80
percent entered employment rate is required;
(2) Measurable effects of the services provided to project
participants as indicated by gains in individuals' skills,
competencies, or other outcomes;
(3) Wages of participants prior to, at placement and 90
days after placement: (a) for dislocated worker
participants: a minimum of 90 percent wage replacement rate
is required for at least 75 percent of the participants and
an average 90 percent wage replacement for the overall
demonstration project is required; (b) for incumbent worker
participants: a minimum of 100 percent wage retention is
required for all participants successfully completing
training and meeting the competencies/skills levels
specified by the employer prior to the training.
(4) For projects serving dislocated workers, as part of
the targeted outcome for wage at placement, each project
should benchmark at least two key wage averages for the
labor market in which each project will operate. Suggested
benchmarks might include:
(a) the average weekly wage in the manufacturing sector,
if the project is focused on manufacturing technology; the
average weekly wage for technical and skilled trade jobs; or
the average weekly wage for computer programmers and (b) the
average wage at placement for the JTPA Title III, dislocated
worker program operated by the local Substate Grantee.
Provide an explanation of the particular benchmarks chosen
for the project. For incumbent workers, indicate the
present wage level of the workers to be trained and discuss
how this wage level compares with the appropriate benchmark
wage for the local labor market area.
(5) For each project serving dislocated workers, at least
80 percent of the individuals placed shall be placed at a
wage that meets or exceeds (a) the average benchmarked wage
in the labor market area, or (b) the average wage at
placement for the last program year completed (currently
1997) for the JTPA Title III dislocated worker program
operated by the local Substate Grantee in the targeted labor
market, whichever is greater. The manufacturing wage for
any labor market may be obtained from the Covered Wages and
Employment Program administered by each State's Employment
Service.
(6) Customer satisfaction with the project services
including participant at critical points in the service
delivery process as well as upon placement and employer
satisfaction with the skills and preparation of the
participants placed with their organization;
(7) Planned average cost per placement (amount of the
grant request divided by the number of program-related
placements, and the cost per placement for continued
placements (the amount of the grant request minus
development/start-up costs divided by the number of program-related placements); and
(8) Other additional measurable, performance-based
outcomes that are relevant to the project and which may be
readily assessed during the period of performance of the
project, such as cost effectiveness of services, comparison
with other available service strategies. Where possible, it
would also be useful to look at production improvement and
other measures the employer uses regarding efficiency,
product quality and output. [Note: An explanation of how
such additional measures are relevant to the purpose of the
demonstration program shall be included in the application.]
E. Collaboration
Describe the nature and extent of collaboration and
working relationships between the applicant and other
workforce development partners in the design and
implementation of the proposed project. Include services to
be provided through resources other than grant funds under
this demonstration. Provide documentation that the
collaboration described can reasonably be expected to occur
(signed letters of agreement and/or the charter of a
formally established advisory council are considered the
strongest evidence, while letters of support are considered
weaker evidence. Because a core purpose of this
demonstration program involves the publicly funded workforce
system, the applicant shall describe working relationships
with local Substate Grantee(s), including One-Stop/Career
Center partners where present.
Describe the number and types of employers to be
directly involved in implementation of the demonstration
through activities as participation on an advisory council,
provision of input to curriculum development and design,
training provider, internship supervision, participation in
establishment of local skill standards, etc. Describe
activities, presently in place or to be undertaken to link
activities to program interventions under this grant to
employers, industry, or curriculum/learning centers
currently designing and developing occupational/job skill
standards and certifications. Collaboration should focus on
linking employers involved in grant activities with any
employer, industry, or trade and worker association that has
already developed or is developing skill standards
certifications. Employer linkages must be specifically
addressed in the application and documentation provided of
the specific role(s) the employer(s) will play in
implementation of the grant provided.
Skill standards play an important role in ensuring
participants are meeting the accepted standards of the
industry. Grant applicants may show how skills standards
and O*NET are used to help dislocated/incumbent workers
acquire training and new jobs. Skill standards can mean
National Skill Standards (NSS) developed under the auspices
of the National Skill Standards Board or other skill
standards recognized by employers as valid requirements for
jobs. O*NET refers to the Occupational Information Network
that replaces the Dictionary of Occupational Titles and
defines all jobs in terns of worker requirements,
occupational requirements, experience requirements, worker
characteristics, occupational characteristics and
occupation-specific requirements. The applicant may request
a brochure explaining O*NET at the following e-mail address:
rannr@doleta.gov.
Skill standards and O*NET are useful for structuring
training curriculum, assessing dislocated/incumbent workers'
skills and interests, and defining career paths from one
occupation to another. Their application in the proposed
project's training design would indicate close links to
employers and an understanding of the demands faced by
workers in high performance workplaces.
Applicants are encouraged to commit matching funds to
the implementation and management of their proposed
programs. Matches may be in the form of cash or in-kind
contributions. These may include but are not limited to
such contributions as the development of training modules;
payment of tuition costs for training; support for child
care or transportation; and provision of staff time at no
cost to the project.
Sources of matching funds may include but are not
limited to employers, employer associations, labor
organizations, and training institutions. With reference to
the sources and amounts of project funds and in-kind
contributions identified in the financial proposal as being
other than those requested under the grant applied for,
describe the basis for valuation of those funds and
contributions. Note: National Reserve Account grants for
specific plant closures and layoffs may not be used to match
demonstration grant funds, these grants provide sufficient
funds to meet the needs of any worker in the targeted
dislocation event. However, NRA grant funds may be used to
purchase 50 percent or less of the total training slots in a
training developed with demonstration grant funds.
Documentation of consultation on the project concept
from applicable labor organizations must be submitted when
20 percent or more of the targeted population is represented
by one or more labor organizations, or where the training is
for jobs where a labor organization represents a substantial
number of workers engaged in similar work. Where the union
has been involved in bargaining relative to the introduction
of either the technology or the addition of new skilled
workers at the workplace, provide information as to any role
the union played in the design and delivery of the training
as well as any impact on the workers with respect to the
growth or shrinkage in the number of jobs, the selection of
workers for retraining,
F. Innovation
Describe key innovations in the proposed project, including
(but not limited to) innovations in concept to be tested,
type of participant to be served, services provided,
delivery of services, training methods, job development, or
job retention strategies. These innovations should be unique
to the ongoing knowledge base of service delivery and
training presently available to the workforce system.
Explain the impact of such innovation on project costs to
substantiate the budget items designated as development and
start-up costs.
G. Previous Experience.
If the applicant has had a demonstration grant with the
Department of Labor, Education or HHS within the last three
years, list the title of the grant, the amount of the grant,
the funding agency, a Federal contact phone number and a
brief summary of purpose of the grant. For those grants,
funded by the Department of Labor explain how this grant
application differs from grant activity. Explain how the
proposed project is similar to and differs from the
applicant's prior and current operations.
H. Project Management
(1) Structure. Describe the management structure for the
project, including a staffing plan that describes each
position and the percentage of its time to be assigned to
this project and assures that sufficient staff are available
to implement the project in a timely and effective manner.
Provide an organizational chart showing the relationship
among project management and operational components,
including those at multiple sites of the project, in the
overall structure of the applicant's organization. Note: It
is highly recommended for applicants requesting $500,000 or
more that a full-time project director be available to
ensure timely implementation of the project.
(2) Program Integrity. Describe the mechanisms to ensure
financial accountability for grant funds and performance
accountability relative to job placements, in accordance
with standards for financial management and participant data
systems in 29 CFR Part 95 or 97, as appropriate, and 20 CFR
627.425. Explain the basis for the applicant's
administrative authority over the management and operational
components.
Describe how information will be collected to determine
the achievement of project outcomes as indicated in section
D of this part; and report on participants, outcomes, and
expenditures.
(3) Monitoring and Reporting. Describe how the project
will keep records of its activities, as required in 29 CFR
Parts 95 and 97 and 20 CRF 631.63 as appropriate, which will
include information such as the following:
(a) Benchmarks. Provide a Time Line of implementation
and projected performance benchmarks covering the period of
performance of the project(Appendix E). Include a monthly
schedule of planned implementation activities and start-up
events (such as curriculum development, selection of
advisory council, advisory council meetings, hiring of
staff, and completion of lease arrangement for space,
development of an internal program progress reporting
system, design of customer satisfaction measures, initiation
of customer satisfaction activities for participants/for
employers); quarterly projections of planned participant
activity, showing cumulative numbers of enrollments,
participation in training and other services, placements,
and terminations; and quarterly cumulative expenditure
projections. The quarterly performance projection data may
be shown in the same implementation benchmark timeline or
separately.
(b) Participant progress. Describe how a participant's
continuing participation in the project will be monitored,
including determination of successful progress in training
activities.
(c) Project performance. Identify the information on
project performance that will be collected on a short-term
basis (e.g., weekly or monthly) by program managers for
internal project management to determine whether the project
is accomplishing its objectives as planned and whether
project adjustments are necessary.
Describe the process and procedures to be used to obtain
feedback from participants, employers, and any other
appropriate parties on the responsiveness and effectiveness
of the services provided. The description shall identify
the types of information to be obtained, the methods and
frequency of data collection, and ways in which the
information will be used in implementing and managing the
project. Grantees may employ focus groups and surveys, in
addition to other methods, to collect feedback information.
Technical assistance in the design and implementation of
customer satisfaction data collection and analysis may be
provided by DOL.
(d) Impact of Collaboration and Innovation. Describe
the process for assessing and reporting on the impact of
collaboration and innovation in the project with respect to
the purpose and goals of the demonstration program and the
specific purpose and goals of the project.
(4) Grievance Procedure.
If the applicant is a JTPA administrative entity or service
provider, assure that a grievance procedure is presently in
place. Otherwise, describe the grievance procedure to be
used for grievances and complaints from participants,
contractors, and other interested parties, consistent with
the requirements at Section 144 of JTPA and 20 CFR 631.64(b)
and (c).
(5) Previous Project Management Experience.
Provide an objective demonstration of the grant applicant's
ability to manage the project, ensure the integrity of the
grant funds, and deliver the proposed performance. Indicate
the grant applicant's past experience in the management of
grant-funded projects similar to that being proposed,
particularly regarding oversight and operating functions
including financial management.
(6) Sustainability and Replicability. Provide assurances
that if the project is successful, the demonstration
partners will continue to improve and develop the
demonstrated approach. Describe the aspects of the
demonstration approach that will allow other workforce
development entities to replicate the proposed project.
Note: The cost per participant will be a consideration in
any replication consideration by other entities. Discuss
the potential applicability of the project, or aspects of
the project (such as new assessment tools, etc.), to other
dislocated worker programs.
Part IV. Evaluation Criteria
Selection of grantees for awards will be made after careful
evaluation of grant applications by a panel selected for
that purpose by DOL. Panel results will be advisory in
nature and not binding on the ETA Grant Officer. Panelists
shall evaluate proposals for acceptability based upon
overall responsiveness in accordance with the factors below.
A. Target Population (10 points).
The description of the characteristics of the target group
to be served is clear and meaningful, and sufficiently
detailed to determine the potential participants' service
need. Documentation is provided showing that a significant
number of eligible dislocated workers who possess these
characteristics are available for participation within the
project area. Sufficient information is provided to explain
how the number of dislocated workers to be enrolled in the
project was determined. The recruitment plan supports the
number of planned enrollments. The target population is
appropriate for the specific purpose of the proposed
project. The project identifies under represented groups to
be trained in the targeted occupation(s).
B. Targeted Jobs (15 points). The jobs in the
manufacturing industry identified by SIC code are clearly
available to workers who have received appropriate training
and preparation given:
(1) the match between the documented skill shortage and
the training planned;
(2) the documentation provided specifying that training
meets or is developed based on industry driven skill
standards or certifications;
(3) the substantial level of involvement of employers
in making known their needs regarding requisite worker
skills necessary for hiring program completers
(4) the documentation and reliability of job
availability is based upon recognized, reliable and timely
sources of information
(5) where appropriate, the role of workers or
representatives of a labor organization representing the
workers in the design and/or delivery of training in
enhancing worker skills during workplace change
C. Service Plan (12 points).
The scope of services to be provided is consistent with the
demonstration program and project purposes and goals. The
scope of services to be provided is adequate to meet the
needs of the target population given:
(1) their characteristics and circumstances;
(2) the complexity of the training and the skills to be
developed relative to their characteristics and previous job
experience
(3) the jobs in which they are to be placed relative to
targeted wage at placement goals;
(4) the length of program participation planned prior
to placement.
D. Costs (20 points)
Proposed costs are reasonable in relation to the
characteristics and circumstances of the target group, the
services to be provided, planned outcomes, the management
plan, and coordination/collaboration with other entities,
including One-Stop/Career Center organizations. The cost
information provided regarding similar training available
through other training providers is within an acceptable
range or sufficient rationale is provided for the cost
differences. The impact of development/start-up and
innovation on costs is explained clearly in the proposal and
is reasonable.
Identification is provided of the specific sources and
amounts of other funds which will be used, in addition to
funds provided through this grant, to implement the project.
The application must include information on any non-JTPA
resources committed to this project, including employer
funds, grants, and other forms of assistance, public and
private. Value and level of external resources being
contributed, including employer contributions, to achieve
program goals will be taken into consideration in the rating
process.
The degree to which other interested partners in the
workforce development system invest resources to test the
concepts put forth in the application.
D. Management (10 points).
The project management plan is designed to track project
performance in such a way as to assure that benchmarks are
achieved in a timely manner, issues affecting performance
such as employer involvement, collaboration partners
commitments, etc. are quickly identified and addressed, and
planned outcomes will be achieved in a cost effective
manner.
The applicant (as a part of a collaborative approach) has
experience working with technology training. The management
structure and management plan for the proposed project will
ensure the integrity of the funds requested. The project
work plan demonstrates the applicant's ability to
effectively track project progress with respect to planned
expenditures. Sufficient procedures are in place to use the
information obtained by the project operator(s) to take
corrective action if indicated. In addition, review by
appropriate labor organizations, where applicable, is
documented.
The proposal includes a method of assessing customer
feedback for both participants and employers involved, and
establishes a mechanism to take into account the results of
such feedback as part of a continuous system of management
and operation of the project.
E. Collaboration (15 points).
The proposal includes evidence of direct participation by
JTPA SubState Grantees and One-Stop/Career Center entities
(where present) in the planning and management of this
grant. Evidence of participation of employers whose
positions are targeted under the grant is present. Evidence
of coordination with other programs and entities for project
design or provision of services is also be provided.
Evidence is presented that ensures cooperation of
coordinating entities, as applicable, for the life of the
proposed project. The project includes a reasonable method
of assessing and reporting on the impact of such
coordination, relative to the demonstration purpose and
goals and the specific purpose and goals of the proposed
project.
F. Innovation (13 points).
The proposal demonstrates innovation in the concept(s) to be
tested, the project's design, and/or the services to be
provided. "Innovation" refers to the degree to which such
concept(s), design and/or services are not currently found
in dislocated worker programs. The project includes a
reasonable method of assessing and reporting on the impact
of such innovation, relative to the demonstration program
and project purposes and goals.
G. Sustainability and Replicability (5 points)
The proposal provides evidence that, if successful,
activities supported by the demonstration grant will be
continued after the expiration date of the grant, using JTPA
Title III formula-allotted funds or other public or private
resources. The likelihood that the approach may be
applicable to a broad range of dislocated worker programs
across the country. The proposal provides evidence that the
approach and training strategy(ies) used can be replicated
by other workforce development partners to address
technology skill shortages in their local area.
Grant applications will be evaluated for the reasonableness
of proposed costs, considering the proposed target group,
targeted jobs, services, outcomes, management plan, and
coordination with other entities.
Applicants are advised that discussions may be necessary in
order to clarify any inconsistency or ambiguity in their
applications. The final decision on awards will be based on
what is most advantageous to the Federal Government as
determined by the ETA Grant Officer. The Government may
elect to award grant(s) without discussion with the
applicant(s). The applicant's signature on the Application
for Federal Assistance (Standard Form) SF-424 constitutes a
binding offer.
Part V. Monitoring, Reporting and Evaluation
A. Monitoring
The Department shall be responsible for ensuring effective
implementation of each competitive grant project in
accordance with the Act, the Regulations, the provisions of
this announcement and the negotiated grant agreement.
Applicants should assume that at least one on-site project
review will be conducted by Department staff, or their
designees. This review will focus on the project's
performance in meeting the grant's programmatic goals and
participant outcomes, complying with the targeting
requirements regarding participants who are served,
expenditure of grant funds on allowable activities,
collaboration with other organizations as required, and
methods for assessment of the responsiveness and
effectiveness of the services being provided. Grants may be
subject to their additional reviews at the discretion of the
Department.
B. Reporting
DOL will arrange for or provide technical assistance to
grantees in establishing appropriate reporting and data
collection methods and processes taking into account the
applicant's project management plan. An effort will be made
to accommodate and provide assistance to grantees to be able
to complete all reporting electronically.
Applicants selected as grantees will be required to provide
the following reports:
1. Monthly progress reports, during initial start-up and
implementation of the project, and Quarterly Progress
Reports
2. Standard Form 269, Financial Status Report Form, on a
quarterly basis
3. Final Project Report including an assessment of project
performance. This report will be submitted in hard copy and
on electronic disk utilizing a format and instructions to be
provided by the Department.
C. Evaluation
DOL will arrange for or conduct an independent evaluation of
the outcomes, impacts, and benefits of the demonstration
projects. Grantees must agree to make available records on
participants and employers as well as project financial and
management data and to provide access to personnel, as
specified by the evaluator(s) under the direction of the
Department.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of December, 1998.
JANICE E. PERRY
Grant Officer
Appendices
1. Appendix A--Application for Federal Assistance
(Standard Form 424)
2. Appendix B-- Budget Information Sheet
3. Appendix C--Application Checklist
Appendix C
Application Checklist
Please complete and submit this checklist with your application.
It should be used as a quick reference of key provisions of the
Solicitation and whether or not these provisions have been
included, complied with or addressed. This document is not
intended to be comprehensive or address every aspect of the
solicitation.
Organization Applying_______________________________.
Contact Person______________________________________.
Phone Number______________________________________.
Date submitted______________________________________.
Application Process
Please check below:
___Application is 20 pages or less.
___Attachments limited to 10 or fewer.
___An original and three copies submitted.
___SF424 (Appendix A) included.
___Budget Information Sheet (Appendix B) included.
___Checklist (Attachment C) included.
___Implementation schedule (Attachment D) included.
___Executive Summary of two pages or less included.
Financial and Technical Provisions
Provide page number below:
___Target Population identified, with supportive documentation.
___Manufacturing industry's(ies') jobs targeted are described and
SIC codes are listed.
___Role and involvement in the project of employers experiencing
skill shortages discussed and documented.
___Role of the local JTPA Substate Grantee for dislocated worker
programs and One-Stop/Career Center system discussed and
documented.
___Number and type of targeted jobs and requisite skill sets for
employment addressed.
___Specific skill standards and certification for targeted
occupations identified and discussed.
___Sources and credibility of labor market/job data cited.
___Approach to identifying and recruiting eligible participants
included.
___Eligibility determination approach discussed.
___Process in selecting eligible participants discussed.
___Job placement strategy included.
___Sequence of services and activities to be provided discussed.
___Flowchart of participant services included.
___Applicants' prior experience with dislocated workers
addressed.
___All project outcomes and measures of success specified in Part
III D addressed.
___Method of assessing impact of coordination included.
___Coordination with other entities discussed.
___Innovation and impact of the project discussed.
___Management structure and staffing plan addressed
___Organizational chart and relationships included.
___Mechanism to ensure financial accountability discussed.
___Basis for applicant's administrative authority addressed.
___Applicant's Method/System to collect, track, manage, report,
and utilize data on the project's progress and performance
addressed.
___Ability to collect and submit SPIR data indicated.
___Benchmarks to indicate planned implementation schedule
included.
___Method to obtain feedback from participants and employers
discussed.
___Past experience in Federal demonstration grant projects
discussed.
___Project's sustainability addressed.
4. Appendix D--Implementation Benchmarks and Time Line