Offerors are encouraged to read the entire Solicitation by scrolling downward. The Solicitation includes all pertinent technical sections imbedded in the document as well as the terms, conditions and instructions required for submitting a proposal. For your convenience, the pertinent technical sections of the Solicitation have also been linked directly below in (WordProcessing format and Adobe PDF format):

Table of Contents        Page

PART I - THE SCHEDULE B-1

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICE/COSTS B-1

SECTION C - DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS/STATEMENT OF WORK C-1
C.1 PURPOSE C-1
C.2 BACKGROUND C-1
C.3 OPERATIONAL PLAN C-2
C.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SPECIFIC TASKS C-2
C.5 STAFFING C-5
C.6 KEY STAFF C-5
C.7 FOOTNOTES C-5

SECTION D - PACKAGING AND MARKING D-1
[FOR THIS SOLICITATION, THERE ARE NO CLAUSES IN THIS SECTION] D-1

SECTION E - INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE E-1
E.1 NOTICE LISTING CONTRACT CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE E-1

SECTION F - DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE F-1
F.1 NOTICE LISTING CONTRACT CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE F-1
F.2 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE F-1
F.3 LEVEL OF EFFORT F-1
F.4 REPORTS/DELIVERABLES F-1

SECTION G - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA G-1
G.1 IDENTITY AND AUTHORITY OF THE CONTRACTING OFFICER'S REPRESENTATIVE (GOVERNMENT AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE) G-1
G.2 INVOICE REQUIREMENTS G-1
G.3 METHOD OF PAYMENT G-2

SECTION H - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS H-1
H.1 BUDGET LINE ITEM FLEXIBILITY H-1
H.2 FRINGE BENEFITS H-1
H.3 VACATIONS, SICK-LEAVE HOLIDAYS H-1
H.4 TRAVEL AND PER DIEM H-1
H.5 USE OF AND PAYMENT TO CONSULTANTS H-2
H.6 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE COST H-2
H.7 ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING SERVICES H-3
H.8 PRINTING H-3
H.9 KEY PERSONNEL H-3
H.10 CONTRACT NUMBER IDENTIFICATION H-4
H.11 SUBMISSION OF CORRESPONDENCE H-4
H.12 OTHER CONTRACTORS H-4
H.13 LAWS APPLICABLE H-4
H.14 DISPOSITION OF MATERIAL H-4
H.15 NONDISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES H-4
H.16 FEDERAL REPORTS H-5
H.17 DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION H-5
H.18 ELIMINATION OF SEXIST LANGUAGE AND ART WORK H-5
H.19 HAZARDOUS OCCUPATION ORDERS H-6
H.20 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS (FAR-SUBPART 28.3) H-6
H.21 DATA COLLECTION FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR H-7
H.22 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS H-7
H.23 RESTRICTION ON USE OF DOL FUNDS FOR LOBBYING H-7
H.24 PUBLICATION OF MATERIALS H-7
H.25 OPTION TO EXTEND THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT - SERVICE (FAR 17.208(G)) H-8
H.26 INDIRECT COSTS H-8

PART II - CONTRACT CLAUSES I-1

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES I-1

I.1 NOTICE LISTING CONTRACT CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE I-1
I.2 52.217-9 OPTION TO EXTEND THE TERM OF THE CONTRACT (MAR 2000) I-2
I.3 52.232-25 PROMPT PAYMENT (FEB 2002) ALTERNATE I (FEB 2002) I-3
I.4 52.232-35 DESIGNATION OF OFFICE FOR GOVERNMENT RECEIPT OF ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER INFORMATION (MAY 1999) I-6
I.5 52.252-2 CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998) I-6
I.6 52.219-14 LIMITATIONS ON SUBCONTRACTING (DEC 1996) I-7

PART III - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS J-1

SECTION J - LIST OF ATTACHMENTS J-1
J.1 CONTRACT PRICING PROPOSAL COVER SHEET, SF 1411, (1 PAGE) J-1
J.2 COST AND PRICE ANALYSIS, ETA 8555, (8 PAGES) J-1
J.3 STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CAPABILITY, ETA 8554, (2 PAGES) J-1
J.4 COST CONTRACTOR'S INVOICE, ETA 3100-1 (1 PAGE) J-1
J.5 COST CONTRACTOR'S DETAILED STATEMENT OF COST, ETA 3-2 J-1
J.6 VETS-100 - FEDERAL CONTRACTOR VETERANS EMPLOYMENT REPORT, J-1
J.7 PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (2 PAGES) J-1
J.8 PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE (2 PAGES) J-1
J.9 ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE (2 PAGES) J-1
J.10 PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS REPORT    html format    MS Word format J-1
J.11 TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES REPORT    html format    pdf format J-1

PART IV - REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS K-1

SECTION K - REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS K-1
K.1 NOTICE LISTING SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE K-1
K.2 52.204-3 TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION (OCT 1998) K-1
K.3 52.209-5 CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, PROPOSED DEBARMENT, AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (DEC 2001) K-2
K.4 52.215-6 PLACE OF PERFORMANCE (OCT 1997) K-3
K.5 52.219-1 SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM REPRESENTATIONS (APR 2002) K-4
K.6 52.222-18 CERTIFICATION REGARDING KNOWLEDGE OF CHILD LABOR FOR LISTED END PRODUCTS (FEB 2001) K-6
K.7 52.222-22 PREVIOUS CONTRACTS AND COMPLIANCE REPORTS (FEB 1999) K-6
K.8 52.222-25 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION COMPLIANCE (APR 1984) K-7
K.9 52.227-15 STATEMENT OF LIMITED RIGHTS DATA AND RESTRICTED COMPUTER SOFTWARE (MAY 1999) K-7
K.10 SIGNATURE BLOCK K-9

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS L-1
L.1 NOTICE LISTING SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE L-1
L.2 52.204-6 DATA UNIVERSAL NUMBERING SYSTEM (DUNS) NUMBER (JUN 1999) L-1
L.3 52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984) L-2
L.4 52.227-6 ROYALTY INFORMATION (APR 1984) L-2
L.5 52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (AUG 1996) L-2
L.6 52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998) L-3
L.7 PAST PERFORMANCE L-3
L.8 ORAL PRESENTATION L-4
L.9 SUBMISSION OF PROPOSAL L-7
L.10 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS L-10
L.11 REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION (RFC) L-10

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD M-1
M.1 NOTICE LISTING SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE M-1
M.2 BASIS FOR AWARD (BEST VALUE) M-1
M.3 EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS FOR AWARD (BEST VALUE) M-2
M.4 DETERMINING BEST OVERALL VALUE M-5

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICE/COSTS

Title: "Management and Support to DOL/ETA's Division of Foreign Labor Certification"

The United States Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, is soliciting proposals to select a contractor to provide Management and Support (Project Management) to ETA's Division of Foreign Labor Certification (DFLC). The successful offeror will provide the DFLC with a broad range of management support services and technical assistance to assist the Division in planning, designing, implementing, and monitoring, an operational plan directed towards elimination of a large backlog of foreign labor certification applications.

Solicitation No. is RFP-DCS-03-34.

This solicitation is a 100% Small Business Set-Aside.

The period of performance will be twenty-four (24) months from the date of contract execution plus two 1-year options to be exercised at the Government's discretion.

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code is 541611, with a $6 million size standard.

A cost reimbursement plus fixed fee type of contract is contemplated being awarded under this solicitation.

THE RECEIPT OF PROPOSAL DATE IS JULY 14, 2003, 2:00 PM LOCAL TIME.

REQUESTS FOR CLARIFICATION (RFC) MUST BE RECEIVED NO LATER THAN JUNE 20, 2003, 5:00 P.M. LOCAL TIME.

Only electronic submission of requests will be accepted. They shall be submitted to Jillian Matz at matz.jillian@dol.gov. Should any RFC be received after the date stated above, the Government reserves the right not to provide an answer. If, however, the Government determines the RFC raises an issue of significant importance, the Government will respond electronically.

The Government will not provide any information concerning requests for clarification in response to telephone calls from offerors. All requests will be answered electronically and provided to all offerors at the DOL/ETA internet site, http://www.doleta.gov/sga/rfp.cfm.

C.1 PURPOSE

The Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (DOL/ETA) is soliciting proposals to select a contractor to provide Management and Support (Project Management) to ETA's Division of Foreign Labor Certification (DFLC). The successful offeror will provide the DFLC with a broad range of management support services and technical assistance to assist the Division in planning, designing, implementing, and monitoring, an operational plan directed towards elimination of a large backlog of foreign labor certification applications. The operational plan for backlog elimination will consist of one or more large scale contracted efforts to establish application-processing facilities for backlog elimination. The successful offeror will work cooperatively with State, local, and Federal officials and other federal contractors and consultants in accomplishing the mission.

C.2 BACKGROUND

The DOL/ETA administers a Permanent Labor Certification program wherein employers apply for approval to hire permanent foreign workers to fill positions that the employer certifies it has been unable to recruit qualified U.S. citizens. DOL's approval of the employer's application becomes a certification to the Department of Homeland Security, Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services (BCIS) that there are no qualified U. S. workers available and willing to accept the job at the prevailing wage for that occupation and at the intended location. Upon DOL issuing a certification, an employer may then file an Immigrant Petition for an Alien Worker with the BCIS on behalf of the foreign worker, attaching the approved labor certification. Denied applications can be appealed to the Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals (BALCA).

Applications submitted by employers for permanent labor certification originate at the State level through State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). Once the SWA has completed their processing of the application, the application is forwarded to a DOL regional office for final review and certification or denial, whichever is appropriate. By law and regulation a Federal official must make the final determination on whether to certify or deny.

The Permanent Labor Certification program has historically operated under the burden of a very large backlog of cases. This backlog has grown through a continuing increase in normal applications and has been exacerbated on several occasions by reinstatement of section 245(i) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act (INA). Section 245(i) allows aliens physically in the U. S. to apply for an adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted to the U. S. if an application for permanent status was submitted to the Department of Labor without being subject to certain other penalties included in the INA. This provision has been reinstated by the Congress on several occasions and has resulted in a large influx of cases and subsequent increase to the backlog.

The current size of the backlog is approximately 300,000 applications. Because of this large backlog, the Permanent Labor Certification program has been identified in the President's "Blueprint for a New Beginning" as a program seriously in need of improvement. To address this concern, a major restructuring of the certification process will be implemented with the introduction of the Program Electronic Review Management System (PERM) during the latter part of calendar year 2003. However, the backlog of applications filed under current regulations must still be processed under the old rules and within the existing system.

In order to get a better understanding of the size and makeup of the existing backlog and to identify ways and means to address the backlog, ETA commissioned a high-level management review of the current system. The major purposes of this review were to identify potential improvements in the current process that could result in efficiencies in processing, and to produce recommendations for short-term solutions, thereby providing rapid reduction or elimination of the backlog. The firm of PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PwC) performed the management review under contract with the DOL. A report was issued in January 2002 (please see Attachment J.10). This report is a primary resource in understanding the nature and complexities of the backlog.

Backlogs occur at both the SWA and the DOL regional office level, however, over 90% of the current backlog is at the SWA level. The PwC report describes in detail the makeup of the backlog, the regional distribution of the backlog, and the type of cases.

One of the recommendations in the PwC management review was to consider contractor assistance in backlog reduction. To test this recommendation before making a costly, larger-scale investment, ETA contracted for a "simulation" of a contractor assisted effort. The simulation, currently an on-going activity, is at a single site, on a small scale (eight work stations), and includes performance by the contractor of all stages of the process, from receipt of an application to final approval or denial by a federal official (footnote #1).

The simulation has shown that the concept of combining the State and Regional processes at the same location, as recommended in the PwC management review, is a viable model for eliminating the backlogged applications within 2 years.

C.3 OPERATIONAL PLAN

In Fiscal Year 2004 (October 1, 2003) and Fiscal Year 2005 (October 1, 2004), significant funding has been budgeted for backlog elimination. While the exact amount to be made available for the processing centers has not been determined, the DFLC's preliminary operational plan anticipates sufficient funding for the establishment of two, national scale, application processing centers with staffing levels between 80 and 100 persons each, consisting of managers, supervisors, and analysts, the individuals responsible for processing applications.

The processing centers will be established through the solicitation and award of one or possibly two contracts (footnote #2). A solicitation for the processing center contract (s) will be issued in fiscal year 2004 as soon as possible following the availability of the fiscal year 2004 funding. Award of the processing center contract is expected to take four to six months following release of the solicitation. This timeline and sequencing will be an important factor in establishing deliverables and priorities under this solicitation.

The successful offeror under this project management solicitation will assist the DFLC in all aspects of implementing the operational plan, from planning and design to providing technical assistance to the government, the processing center contractor (s) and monitoring contractor performance. Technical assistance to the processing center contractor(s) will include providing training to the processing staff. The project management contractor will be a primary source for advising and making recommendations to federal officials on the operational plan and monitoring and advising federal representatives on all aspects of contractor performance. Because frequent, and at times, daily contact will be required between the management support contractor and the staff of DLFC, the successful offeror will be required to have an office location in the Washington metropolitan area.

As stated above, the Management and Support contractor will be closely involved in planning and design of DFLC'c continuing operational plan, including procurement related events. The contractor will perform a critical role in monitoring and reporting on the performance of processing center contractor(s). Therefore, the successful offeror under this solicitation/award must recuse themselves, their subcontractors, consultants or others assigned to this award, from participation in any capacity (as an offeror, prime contractor, subcontractor, or consultant), in submitting proposals for the processing center contracts directed towards backlog elimination or other solicitations issued by DFLC related to the Permanent Labor Certification program. The successful offeror under this solicitation/award will have a continuing role, consistent with the terms and conditions of its contract with DOL, in supporting and advising the DFLC on its operational plans and is expected to represent the Government's interests in a fair, impartial and prudent manner, without conflict of interests or the appearance of a conflict of interests.

C.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SPECIFIC TASKS

For convenience and understanding, the tasks to be performed under the management support contract are divided into three primary tasks with subtasks. For staffing purposes and scheduling deliverables offerors may find it useful for planning purposes to look at the three primary tasks as phases of the operational plan. The three primary tasks or project phases are listed below.

Task 1 Project Planning and Design.
Task 2 Implementation, Technical Assistance, and Start-up.
Task 3 Project Monitoring and Reporting.

TASK 1 PROGRAM PLANNING AND DESIGN

Task one or Phase One includes all those activities and deliverables to be completed up to the award of the processing center contract (s). Tasks and sub-tasks under his phase must begin immediately upon award of the Project Management contract. In addition to overall planning and design of the operational plan, technical assistance in selective areas under this phase will contribute to drafting language on specific topics for inclusion in the scope of work for the processing center contract solicitation. The following specific subtasks are included under task one.

1. Following award of the contract, the contractor will conduct the necessary literature review, interviews, and other activities to gain a thorough knowledge and understanding of the Permanent Labor Certification Program. The review will include an understanding of the statutory and regulatory basis of the program and the responsibilities of federal and state agencies in the application process. The offeror must become thoroughly familiar with the application and certification process.

2. The offeror will review reports, and conduct interviews as necessary, to become familiar with the operation, outcomes, and lessons learned from the simulation project. The offeror will advise the government on the preferred level of education and experience requirements for the application processing analysts' positions.

3. The offeror will review the information technology/software programs developed by the simulation contractor under its contract with DOL and currently used by the simulation contractor in the application and certification process (footnote #3). The offeror will evaluate the adequacy of the technology, system documentation, and will advise and make recommendations to the government on issues or concerns regarding scalability and adoption to a much larger processing environment. The offeror will also prepare an inventory of equipment at the simulation site for transition from the simulation contractor to the processing centers. The offeror may be requested to assist in preparing budget estimates and quantities for system requirements.

The offeror will assist the government in drafting appropriate descriptive and technical language for system requirements under the solicitation for the processing centers.

4. The offeror will have primary responsibility for designing and conducting a training program for the large staff of analysts responsible for application processing under the processing center contract (s). The management and support contractor will review and assess existing training materials and supplement as necessary, including assembling an application processing manual or reference guide for the analyst to use on a day-to-day basis. The management contractor will identify or set-aside in its business cost proposal under this solicitation sufficient funds for a minimum of two, four-day training sessions for up to 200 analysts (100 per center). The management contractor's responsibilities for the training sessions will include providing instructors, materials, visuals aids, and other customary and necessary items. It is intended that the training sessions will be conducted at the processing centers to reduce costs and have access to computer stations. The offeror will make recommendations on the optimal length, number, and the format of the training sessions. Federal National Office and Regional Office staff will participate in the training sessions on a limited basis.

5. The offeror will assist the government in establishing productivity standards to be included in the processing center solicitation/contract. It is critical that the resources dedicated to backlog reduction be used efficiently and effectively to achieve the mission and that there be a system and standards in place for measuring performance. For example, performance standards may include the number of applications processed to final certification or denial on a monthly basis, the number of applications referred back to an analyst by the certifying officer as incomplete (quality control), staff performance, and other elements that will provide a clear measurement of performance. Performance standards should contribute not only to measuring outputs but also as means to enhance productivity and quality. Consistent performance below benchmarks or performance standards may be subject to penalties consistent with the terms of the solicitation/contract.

6. The offeror will review relevant reports and other material for the purposes of making recommendations on ways and means to monitor, prevent, and detect instances of program fraud and abuse in the labor certification process at the processing centers.

7. The offeror will submit written reports or brief papers on topics and tasks under Task One, Program Planning and Design, within 30 to 60 days of contract award depending on the agreed upon timeline and sequencing of subtasks. The government may requests partial or draft reports on topics or direct the offeror to research specific questions or topics during this phase to assist in preparation of solicitation language or respond to other DFLC needs. Flexibility in responding to changing needs and priorities is critical during Phase One.

TASK TWO IMPLEMENTATION, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, AND START-UP

Task Two will begin with award of the processing center contract (s). It is anticipated at this time that the processing center contractor will be allowed 60 days for start-up. Start-up includes occupying and setting-up the offices and workstations, acquiring and installing computer and phone systems, hiring of staff, and all of those functions necessary to provide an efficient and effective work environment. The management contractor will have primary responsibility for overseeing and advising the DFLC of progress under this phase.

1. The management contractor will, within ten days of award of the processing center contract, coordinate and schedule a planning session with DFLC staff and the processing center contractor (s) to review and discuss the contractor's start-up plan. The planning session will include discussion and scheduling of technical assistance, the staff-training schedule and other areas of coordination and cooperation. The project management staff, federal representatives and the processing center contractor will agree on a schedule for weekly discussions and reporting on the progress of the start-up plan.

2. The management and support contractor will have primary responsibility for assessing the progress of the start-up plan and advising the federal staff on progress and problems. The management contractor will be the first point of contact for the processing center contractor.

3. The management contractor will finalize the schedule and provide the training sessions for the processing center staff.

TASK 3 PROJECT MONITORING AND REPORTING

1. The management and support contractor will monitor the performance of the processing centers and provide monthly reports to the DFLC. Monitoring will include regular site visits to the processing centers, review of processing center reports, the early detection and notification to the DFLC of potential problems and recommendations for improvements or changes in procedures to increase productivity. The management contractor will advise the DFLC on a monthly basis of performance against the productivity standards.

2. The management contractor may interview federal certifying officers co-located at the processing centers on a regular basis for information on quality control and areas where additional training may be required.

3. The management contractor will serve as the "eyes and hears" of the government in all aspects of performance of the processing centers. The Project Management contractor must maintain a cooperative but independent, objective, and professional relationship with the processing center management and staff.

C.5 STAFFING

The anticipated staffing levels described in Section C.3 include the Project Director, Assistant Project Director, research associates or program analysts, and subject matter experts (training, information technology or others). While continuity in leadership positions is essential, it should be apparent that staffing needs and expertise may change as the operational plan progresses. Once the processing centers becomes fully operational, for example, the need for technical assistance to the processing center contractor (s) will rapidly decline as will the need for large scale training. It is likely the processing center contractors will have direct IT assistance. Project monitoring and data analysis will become a fulltime effort involving considerable travel. In presenting its proposed staffing plan, offerors must carefully review and consider the tasks and subtasks to be performed in each phase and demonstrate its capacity to both estimate and adjust the staffing plan both in quantity, time commitment, and subject matter expertise to changing needs. In evaluating the offerors staffing plan the government will carefully consider how the plan demonstrates the offerors an understanding of the role of the support contractor and the tasks to be performed.

The offerors technical proposal must provide an organizational chart and staff time/loading chart showing the amount of time by phase of each labor category for each task and subtasks. The offeror shall also present in its technical proposal a Gantt chart that illustrates the offerors proposed work schedule by week or month, showing the starting date and ending date of each task, subtask or activity. (More detailed information is contained in Section L of this solicitation.)

It cannot be overemphasized that the qualifications of the offerors proposed staff, the sequencing of activities and allocation of staff with the educational backgrounds and demonstrated work experience appropriate to those activities is essential.

C.6 KEY STAFF

The offerors Project Director and Assistant Project Director and Training Specialist are considered key staff. It is considered essential that the offerors proposed key staff be readily accessible and capable of responding to changing needs and work loads.

Project Director (100% time commitment) and Assistant Project Director (100% time commitment) - The offerors proposed Project Director and Assistant Project Director must have a Bachelors degree from an accredited institution of higher education and have five years and three years experience respectively in managing or evaluating projects of similar size and purpose. While it is not required that the proposed project directors have experience in managing or evaluating a program involving labor certification, experience in similar programs, either governmental or private, is highly desirable. The offerors proposed Project Director or Assistant Project Director should also have demonstrated experience in providing technical assistance to program operations. The proposed individuals must be able to work cooperatively with officials at all levels of an organization, both government and private, be able to adjust quickly to changing needs and priorities, and have excellent communication skills, both orally and in writing.

Training Specialist (20% time commitment) - The offerors proposed Training Specialist must have a Bachelors degree in a related field from an accredited institution of higher education and five years experience in designing and implementing training programs similar in scope and complexity, i.e., size and related or similar subject matter.

Other Staff- Other staff may include an Information Technology Specialist, Research Associates, training instructors, support staff and others as proposed by the offeror. The individual (s) proposed must have the educational and demonstrated work experience appropriate to their proposed positions.

C.7 FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE #1: The simulation is being conducted by Technology and Management Services, Inc (Please see Attachment J.11). Offerors wishing to review the contract must submit a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to Mr. Keith Bond, Division of Contract Services, Room S-4203, 200 Constitution Avenue, N. W., Washington, D.C., 20210.

FOOTNOTE #2: The locations of the processing centers will be based on recommendations made by offerors responding to the processing center solicitation. The government will not select the locations except to require that they be within commuting distance of USDOL regional offices. California will not be included in the operational plan for backlog reduction.

FOOTNOTE #3: The system developed under the simulation contract is called Centralized Application Processing System (CAPS). It is a web-based application allowing for remote access for privileged users to check application status, enter data, etc. The database, Microsoft SQL Server 2000, is scalable and should be able to be expanded to meet the requirements of the processing centers.

[FOR THIS SOLICITATION, THERE ARE NO CLAUSES IN THIS SECTION]

E.1 NOTICE LISTING CONTRACT CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The following contract clauses pertinent to this section are hereby incorporated by reference (by Citation Number, Title, and Date) in accordance with the clause at FAR "52.252-2 CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE" in Section I of this contract. See FAR 52.252-2 for an internet address (if specified) for electronic access to the full text of a clause.

 
	NUMBER		TITLE							DATE
	
 
	52.246-5	INSPECTION OF						APR 1984
			SERVICES--COST-REIMBURSEMENT
 

 
	NUMBER		TITLE					DATE
	
 
	52.242-15	STOP-WORK ORDER				AUG 1989
			ALTERNATE I (APR 1984)
 
 

	-	< Project Director
	-	< Assistance Project Director
	-	< Training Specialist
	-	
	-	
	-	
 

Option
Year	Estimated Cost	Indirect Cost	Total Estimated Cost
 
   1		$.00		
   2			
  			
  	

                              BLOCK 1
 
 Rate category:  (check one)   		Your rates and bases are:
 Billing                       		Overhead
 Provisional                   		Base:
 Final                         		(And, if applicable)
 See Attached Agreement        		General and Admin.
 Other (Explain)               		Base:
 
 Effective from    to  or  if multi-year, please explain here:
 

 
	NUMBER		TITLE					DATE
	
 
	52.202-1	DEFINITIONS	DEC 2001
	52.203-3	GRATUITIES	APR 1984
	52.203-5	COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES	APR 1984
	52.203-6	RESTRICTIONS ON SUBCONTRACTOR SALES TO	JUL 1995
				THE GOVERNMENT
	52.203-7	ANTI-KICKBACK PROCEDURES	JUL 1995
	52.203-8	CANCELLATION, RESCISSION, AND RECOVERY	JAN 1997
				OF FUNDS FOR ILLEGAL OR IMPROPER
				ACTIVITY
	52.203-10	PRICE OR FEE ADJUSTMENT FOR ILLEGAL OR	JAN 1997
				IMPROPER ACTIVITY
	52.203-12	LIMITATION ON PAYMENTS TO INFLUENCE	JUN 1997
				CERTAIN FEDERAL TRANSACTIONS
	52.204-4	PRINTED OR COPIED DOUBLE-SIDED	AUG 2000
				ON RECYCLED PAPER
	52.209-6	PROTECTING THE GOVERNMENT'S INTEREST	JUL 1995
				WHEN SUBCONTRACTING WITH CONTRACTORS
				DEBARRED, SUSPENDED, OR PROPOSED FOR
				DEBARMENT
	52.215-2	AUDIT AND RECORDS--NEGOTIATION	JUN 1999
	52.215-8	ORDER OF PRECEDENCE--UNIFORM CONTRACT	OCT 1997
				FORMAT
	52.216-7	ALLOWABLE COST AND PAYMENT	DEC 2002
	52.216-8	FIXED-FEE	MAR 1997
	52.219-6	NOTICE OF TOTAL SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE	JUL 1996
	52.219-8	UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS	OCT 2000
	52.219-14	LIMITATIONS ON SUBCONTRACTING	DEC 1996
	52.222-1	NOTICE TO THE GOVERNMENT OF LABOR	FEB 1997
				DISPUTES
	52.222-3	CONVICT LABOR	AUG 1996
	52.222-21	PROHIBITION OF SEGREGATED FACILITIES	FEB 1999
	52.222-26	EQUAL OPPORTUNITY	APR 2002
	52.222-35	EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR SPECIAL DISABLED	DEC 2001
				VETERANS, OF THE VIETNAM ERA, AND OTHER
				ELIGIBLE VETERANS
	52.222-36	AFFIRMATIVE ACTION FOR WORKERS WITH	JUN 1998
				DISABILITIES
	52.222-37	EMPLOYMENT REPORTS ON SPECIAL DISABLED	DEC 2001
				VETERANS, VETERANS OF THE VIETNAM ERA,
				AND OTHER ELIGIBLE VETERANS
	52.222-38	COMPLIANCE WITH VETERANS' EMPLOYMENT	DEC 2001
				REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
	52.223-6	DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE	MAY 2001
	52.225-13	RESTRICTIONS ON CERTAIN FOREIGN	JUL 2000
				PURCHASES
	52.227-1	AUTHORIZATION AND CONSENT	JUL 1995
	52.227-2	NOTICE AND ASSISTANCE REGARDING PATENT	AUG 1996
				AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
	52.227-14	RIGHTS IN DATA--GENERAL	JUN 1987
	52.228-7	INSURANCE--LIABILITY TO THIRD PERSONS	MAR 1996
	52.232-17	INTEREST	JUN 1996
	52.232-22	LIMITATION OF FUNDS	APR 1984
	52.232-23	ASSIGNMENT OF CLAIMS	JAN 1986
	52.232-33	PAYMENT BY ELECTRONIC FUNDS--CENTRAL	MAY 1999
				CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION
	52.233-1	DISPUTES	JUL 2002
				ALTERNATE I (DEC 1991)
	52.233-3	PROTEST AFTER AWARD	AUG 1996
				ALTERNATE I (JUN 1985)
	52.242-1	NOTICE OF INTENT TO DISALLOW COSTS	APR 1984
	52.242-3	PENALTIES FOR UNALLOWABLE COSTS	MAY 2001
	52.242-4	CERTIFICATION OF FINAL INDIRECT COSTS	JAN 1997
	52.242-13	BANKRUPTCY	JUL 1995
	52.243-2	CHANGES--COST REIMBURSEMENT	AUG 1987
				ALTERNATE I (APR 1984)
	52.244-2	SUBCONTRACTS	AUG 1998
				ALTERNATE II (AUG 1998)
	52.244-5	COMPETITION IN SUBCONTRACTING	DEC 1996
	52.244-6	SUBCONTRACTS FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS	MAY 2002
	52.246-25	LIMITATION OF LIABILITY--SERVICES	FEB 1997
	52.248-1	VALUE ENGINEERING	FEB 2000
	52.249-6	TERMINATION (COST-REIMBURSEMENT)	SEP 1996
	52.249-14	EXCUSABLE DELAYS	APR 1984
	52.253-1	COMPUTER GENERATED FORMS	JAN 1991