Skip to content
  ETA Home / Trade Act Programs / Taa / Taadecisions /  

TAA Decision 96927

Note: Determinations for this case number, this case number with an alphabetic suffix, and any appeals or amendments appear below.

        UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 
Employment and Training Administration 
TA-W-96,927 
MITSUBISHI AIRCRAFT CORPORATION AMERICA INC. 

RENTON, WASHINGTON 
Certification Regarding Eligibility 
To Apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance for Workers 

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended ("the Act"), 19 U.S.C. 
§ 2273, the Department of Labor ("Department") herein presents the results of an investigation 
regarding certification of eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance ("TAA") for workers. 

The investigation was initiated in response to a TAA petition dated May 28, 2021 and 
filed on June 3, 2021 by a State Workforce Office, on behalf of workers and former workers of 
Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation America Inc., Renton, Washington (hereafter referred to as the 
"worker group"). In accordance with 20 C.F.R. 618.110 a worker group is defined as, ""¦inclusive 
of teleworkers and staffed workers." 

The worker group is engaged in activities related to the supply of aircraft certification, 
analysis, maintenance, flight testing, design, and engineering support and are not separately 
identifiable by service. 

The petition alleged that worker separations, or threats thereof, were due to a shift in 
services to Japan. 

During the course of the investigation, the Department collected information from the 
petitioner(s), the workers' firm, and other relevant sources. 

The group eligibility requirements for workers of a firm under Section 222(a) of the Act, 
19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), are satisfied if the following criteria are met: 

Employment Criterion 

(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm have become 
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated. 
20 C.F.R. 618.225(b)(2)(i)(B) states that an "analysis of separation data must generally 
consist of a: "(1) Comparison of employment on the petition date to employment on the date that is 
1 year prior to the petition date; (2) Review of employment activity during the 1-year period prior 
to the petition date; and (3) Review of evidence provided by the workers' firm regarding actual and 
threatened separations that occur, or are scheduled to occur, after the petition date." 

The Department determines that the employment criterion has been met. 

Shift/Acquisition Criterion 

(2)(B)(i)(I) there has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign country in the production 
of articles or the supply of services like or directly competitive with articles which 
are produced or services which are supplied by such firm; or 

(II) such workers' firm has acquired from a foreign country articles or services that 
are like or directly competitive with articles which are produced or services which 
are supplied by such firm; 
According to 20 C.F.R. 618.225(b)(2)(ii)(B), "Analysis of shift data must generally consist 
of a: (1) Comparison of shift/acquisition data on the petition date to shift/acquisition data that is 
1 year prior to the petition date; (2) Review of shift/acquisition activity during the 1-year period 
prior to the petition date; and (3) Review of evidence provided by the workers' firm regarding shift/ 
acquisition activity scheduled to occur after the petition date." 

The Department determines that the shift criterion has been met. 

Contributed Importantly Criterion 

(ii) the shift described in clause (i)(I) or the acquisition of articles or services described 
in clause (i)(II) contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of 
separation. 
Sec. 222(c) of the Trade Act and 20 C.F.R. 618.110 defines contributed importantly as "a 
cause that is important but not necessarily more important than any other cause." 

According to 20 C.F.R. 618.225(b)(2)(iii), "(A) Analysis of impact of shift activity on 
worker separations must generally consist of determining: (1) Whether there are one or more events 
or factors that sever or lessen the causal nexus between the shift activity and worker separations 
or threat of separation; (2) What percentage of the workers' firm sales or production declines was 
attributable to the firm's shift activity; (3) Whether operations at the workers' firm domestic facility 
or facilities decreased at the same or at a greater rate than operations at the foreign facility or 
facilities; and (4) Whether there are other events or factors that mitigate or amplify the impact 
of shift activity on the workers' firm. (B) The impact may be determined using a quantitative or 
qualitative analysis." 

The Department determines that the contributed importantly criterion has been met. 
Conclusion 

After careful review of the facts obtained in the investigation, I determine that workers of 
Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation America Inc., Renton, Washington, who are engaged in activities 
related to the supply of aircraft certification, analysis, maintenance, flight testing, design, and 
engineering support meet the worker group certification criteria under Section 222(a) of the Act, 
19 U.S.C. § 2272(a). In accordance with Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2273, I make the 
following certification: 

"All workers of Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation America Inc., Renton, Washington, who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after May 28, 2020 through 
two years from the date of certification, and all workers in the group threatened with total 
or partial separation from employment on the date of certification through two years from 
the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of 
Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended." 

Signed in Washington, D.C. this 23rd day of September, 2021. 

/s/ Hope D. Kinglock
_______________________
HOPE D. KINGLOCK 
Certifying Officer, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 
Employment and Training Administration 
TA-W-96,927A 
MITSUBISHI AIRCRAFT CORPORATION AMERICA INC. 
MOSES LAKE, WASHINGTON 
Certification Regarding Eligibility 

To Apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance for Workers 

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended ("the Act"), 19 U.S.C. 
§ 2273, the Department of Labor ("Department") herein presents the results of an investigation 
regarding certification of eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance ("TAA") for workers. 

The investigation was initiated in response to a TAA petition dated May 28, 2021 and 
filed on June 3, 2021 by a State Workforce Office, on behalf of workers and former workers of 
Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation America Inc., Moses Lake, Washington (hereafter referred to as 
the "worker group"). In accordance with 20 C.F.R. 618.110 a worker group is defined as, ""¦ 
inclusive of teleworkers and staffed workers." 

The worker group is engaged in activities related to the supply of aircraft certification, 
analysis, maintenance, flight testing, design, and engineering support services and are not 
separately identifiable by service. 

The petition alleged that worker separations, or threats thereof, were due to a shift in 
services to Japan. 

During the course of the investigation, the Department collected information from the 
petitioner(s), the workers' firm, and other relevant sources. 

The group eligibility requirements for workers of a firm under Section 222(a) of the Act, 
19 U.S.C. § 2272(a), are satisfied if the following criteria are met: 

Employment Criterion 

(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm have become 
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated. 
20 C.F.R. 618.225(b)(2)(i)(B) states that an "analysis of separation data must generally 
consist of a: "(1) Comparison of employment on the petition date to employment on the date that is 
1 year prior to the petition date; (2) Review of employment activity during the 1-year period prior 
to the petition date; and (3) Review of evidence provided by the workers' firm regarding actual and 
threatened separations that occur, or are scheduled to occur, after the petition date." 

The Department determines that the employment criterion has been met. 

Shift/Acquisition Criterion 

(2)(B)(i)(I) there has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign country in the production 
of articles or the supply of services like or directly competitive with articles which 
are produced or services which are supplied by such firm; or 

(II) such workers' firm has acquired from a foreign country articles or services that 
are like or directly competitive with articles which are produced or services which 
are supplied by such firm; 
According to 20 C.F.R. 618.225(b)(2)(ii)(B), "Analysis of shift data must generally consist 
of a: (1) Comparison of shift/acquisition data on the petition date to shift/acquisition data that is 
1 year prior to the petition date; (2) Review of shift/acquisition activity during the 1-year period 
prior to the petition date; and (3) Review of evidence provided by the workers' firm regarding shift/ 
acquisition activity scheduled to occur after the petition date." 

The Department determines that the shift criterion has been met. 

Contributed Importantly Criterion 

(ii) the shift described in clause (i)(I) or the acquisition of articles or services described 
in clause (i)(II) contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of 
separation. 
Sec. 222(c) of the Trade Act and 20 C.F.R. 618.110 defines contributed importantly as "a 
cause that is important but not necessarily more important than any other cause." 

According to 20 C.F.R. 618.225(b)(2)(iii), "(A) Analysis of impact of shift activity on 
worker separations must generally consist of determining: (1) Whether there are one or more events 
or factors that sever or lessen the causal nexus between the shift activity and worker separations 
or threat of separation; (2) What percentage of the workers' firm sales or production declines was 
attributable to the firm's shift activity; (3) Whether operations at the workers' firm domestic facility 
or facilities decreased at the same or at a greater rate than operations at the foreign facility or 
facilities; and (4) Whether there are other events or factors that mitigate or amplify the impact 
of shift activity on the workers' firm. (B) The impact may be determined using a quantitative or 
qualitative analysis." 

The Department determines that the contributed importantly criterion has been met. 
Conclusion 

After careful review of the facts obtained in the investigation, I determine that workers 
of Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation America Inc., Moses Lake, Washington, who are engaged in 
activities related to the supply of aircraft certification, analysis, maintenance, flight testing, design, 
and engineering support services meet the worker group certification criteria under Section 222(a) 
of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(a). In accordance with Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. § 2273, I 
make the following certification: 

"All workers of Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation America Inc., Moses Lake, Washington, 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after May 28, 2020 
through two years from the date of certification, and all workers in the group threatened 
with total or partial separation from employment on the date of certification through two 
years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended." 

Signed in Washington, D.C. this 23rd day of September, 2021. 

/s/ Hope D. Kinglock
_______________________
HOPE D. KINGLOCK 
Certifying Officer, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance 


      

Text only version